Posted on

Accountability and Victimization-Getting Off the Hamster Wheel and Getting to Engaged Leadership

In part one of this article I will define the differences between making mink 3d eyelashes manufacturer as a victim or as an accountable leader. In part two of this article I will define what it takes to act as an accountable executive leader and offer some solutions operating from the accountable stance. Operating from an accountable standpoint offers obvious advantages to any organization. In the past I’ve had conversations with leaders about accountability and mink 3d eyelashes manufacturer. Most often, they bemoan the lack of accountability in their organizations saying such things as “people don’t take ownership” or “they don’t act as if it is their project” yet they often don’t know what to do differently. Many leaders need their people to be accountable yet they don’t know how to encourage the accountability behavior. I’ll talk more about this later.

mink 3d eyelashes manufacturer
mink 3d eyelashes manufacturer

Oifam I recently gained some critical insights on accountability while attending a seminar by Keller Williams, the national real estate mink 3d eyelashes manufacturer. During the seminar we compared accountability to its opposite, victimization. The accountable stance in their model includes:Gaining clarity about an issue and defining the problem

  • Applying attention,energy and focus
  • Exploring possibilities
  • Making plans for change
  • Implementing change

Compare this to the victim stance which includes:

  • Denial of business reality
  • Projection onto others
  • Deflection of ideas away from me
  • Resignation
  • Status Quo

Quite frankly, I never viewed victimization as the opposite of accountability. The model shows the mink 3d eyelashes manufacturer nicely as two different paths to a decision. In the accountable path, reality showed up, the leader became aware of the business reality, decided what to do and then took action. The accountable path is shown above. While not necessarily the easiest path, this approach provides the best long term business results. In the victim decision making path, the leader was confronted with current business reality: the company is losing market share, there is a problem employee who is also a good friend of theirs, they are just barely meeting the sales numbers. Management does not want to confront business reality so they place blame for problems on others. They may say things like, “We just don’t have the people to get the job done,” or “We didn’t have good information.” In the end, the leader as victim is left with hoping, waiting and resignation. Maintenance of the status quo is the outcome. Employee initiative and morale may remain low as well. How do we choose one path and not the other? How can we get effectively from one side of the decision making table to the other? As leaders, how can we get more of our people to act more often from the stance of accountability and not as victims? These are mink 3d eyelashes manufacturer that leaders are looking to answer to improve both individual and organizational performance.

mink 3d eyelashes manufacturer
mink 3d eyelashes manufacturer

These questions are especially critical for a new leader who is on-boarding. For me, increased understanding comes from the work of Drs. Noel Larson and Jim Maddock and their victim/perpetrator model. The denial of reality occurs in two typical ways: as the victim who experiences reality and shrinks from it or as the perpetrator who has a similar uncomfortable experience or feelings and mink 3d eyelashes manufacturer out, attacks, blames or ridicules other.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *